IHRC to appear before High Court in fitness to plead case

The Irish Human Rights Commission (IHRC) was today granted permission by the High Court to appear as amicus curiae (non-partisan friend of the court) in the proceedings B.G. v District Judge Catherine Murphy, the Director of Public Prosecutions, Ireland and the Attorney General pursuant to Section 8(h) of the Human Rights Commission Act 2000.

The case arises from the prosecution (for sexual assault) of an individual with significant mental disabilities, where an issue arises as to the individual’s fitness for trial within the meaning of Section 4 of the Criminal Law (Insanity) Act 2006. As the legislation requires the case to be sent forward from the District Court to the Circuit Court for trial, the individual may face more severe penalties as a consequence, if convicted.

The High Court will consider whether Section 4 is Constitutional or in the alternative whether it is compatible with the State’s obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights.

The IHRC will present written and oral submissions in the case which will be held over 2 days on 22 November next.

The full text of the IHRC’s written submissions will be made available on the IHRC’s website www.ihrc.ie on the final day of trial.

ENDS/

For further information, please contact:
Fidelma Joyce Irish Human Rights Commission Tel: 01 8589601 Mobile: 087 7834939

Notes to Editors

  • Under section 8(h) of the Human Rights Commission Act 2000, the IHRC may, at the discretion of the High Court or the Supreme Court, appear as amicus curiae in proceedings that involve or are concerned with the human rights of any person.
  • Section 2 of the Human Rights Commission Act, 2000 defines "human rights" to include those rights conferred on or guaranteed to persons under the Constitution and under any agreement, treaty or convention to which the State is a party.
  • The IHRC first appeared as amicus curiae before the Supreme Court in April 2005 in the case of Dublin City Council v Fennell which involved issues regarding the interpretation and effect of the European Convention on Human Rights Act. Since then it has regularly been granted liberty to appear before the Supreme Court and High Court.
  • The IHRC was put on notice of these proceedings pursuant to section 6(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights Act 2003 which requires certain human rights cases to be notified to the Commission.
  • The statutory provisions which fall for consideration under the Constitution and ECHR in this case are Section 13(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act 1967 as amended, Section 2 of the Criminal Law (Rape) (Amendment) Act 1990 (as amended) and Section 4 of the Criminal Law (Insanity) Act 2006 as amended.