The Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission (the ‘Commission’) welcomes the decision of Mr Justice Iarfhlaith O’Neill, that survivors of child sexual abuse in National Schools cannot be excluded from the State’s ex gratia (out of court) payment scheme because they have not established a ‘prior complaint’ against their abuser.
In November 2017, Mr Justice O’Neill was appointed by the Government as an Independent Assessor to review cases where applicants to the State’s ex-gratia scheme, established in the wake of the European Court of Human Rights (‘ECtHR’) judgment in the O’Keeffe v. Ireland decision, had their applications declined by the State Claims Agency.
Since last year the Commission has engaged with Mr Justice O’Neill and communicated its long-established position that the State’s unduly narrow interpretation of the meaning of the Strasbourg Court’s judgment in O’Keeffe is not constructed on a firm legal basis.
Mr Justice O’Neill has today found the State’s requirement of a ‘prior complaint’ for an applicant to the ex gratia scheme to be eligible for a payment is incompatible with the ECtHR judgment in O’Keeffe v Ireland. He went further to hold that the “prior complaint” condition risks a “continuing breach of the rights under Article 13 of the ECHR” (the right to an effective remedy) of those survivors of child sexual abuse in National Schools.
Mr Justice O’Neill has found that the 13 cases submitted to him for review, where the applicants were refused on the sole ground that they failed to furnish evidence of a “prior complaint” are entitled to a payment under the ex gratia scheme.
In relation to the 6 remaining cases before him (where the State Claims Agency had refused payments for two reasons – namely that the applicants had failed to furnish evidence of “prior complaint” and because they did not have litigation against the State which they had discontinued), Mr Justice O’Neill found that while the applicants are not entitled to payment under the ex gratia scheme, he considered that there may still be a more appropriate avenue of redress outside the terms of that scheme.
The Commission has been raising concerns, at both European and national level, about the State’s ex gratia scheme since 2015. Specifically, the Commission has warned that the scheme’s requirement that survivors of historic child sexual abuse in schools must establish a prior complaint of child sex abuse does not comply with the 2014 ruling of the ECtHR in O’Keeffe v. Ireland.
In October 2015, the Commission reported to the Council of Europe’s Committee of Ministers its concern that the State has adopted an unduly restrictive and narrow approach to the category of “victim” of abuse in its interpretation of the ECtHR ruling. A further submission to the Council of Europe also followed in October 2016 on the State’s ongoing restrictive interpretation.
The Commission is now calling for the Government to quickly overhaul its ex gratia scheme to ensure effective remedy to those who are being denied justice by State inaction. The need for Government to address these findings without further delay is heightened by the fact, that many survivors of abuse, are advancing in age and have been seeking not only compensation but also an acknowledgement of the wrong done to them since their childhood.
Emily Logan, Chief Commissioner of the Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission, stated:
“Louise O’Keeffe’s long fight for justice should have finally paved the way to an effective remedy for survivors of child abuse in Irish schools, but instead the State’s narrow interpretation of that ruling has served only to block, deny and frustrate victims. “The Commission welcomed the opportunity to make submissions to the Independent Assessor on this important human rights issue and the Commission hopes that his decision will now lead the Government to immediately put in place a remedy that complies with the O’Keeffe judgment and ensures an effective remedy to survivors of child abuse in Irish Schools.”ENDS/ For further information, please contact: Síle Murphy - 086 0288 132 Follow us on twitter @_IHREC
Editor’s notes
Chronology of Commission Concerns:- The full text of the Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission March 2019 submission to the Independent Assessor Mr. Justice Iarfhlaith O’Neill is available at: Submissions of the Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission to the Independent Assessor
- The full text of the Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission December 2018 submission to the Independent Assessor Mr. Justice Iarfhlaith O’Neill is available at: Supplemental Submission by the Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission
- The full text of the Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission June 2018 submission to the Independent Assessor Mr. Justice Iarfhlaith O’Neill is available at: Submissions to the Independent Assessor by the Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission
- The Commission’s October 2016 written submission to the Council of Europe’s Committee of Ministers on the State’s restrictive interpretation of the O’Keeffe v Ireland judgment is available at: O'Keeffe-v-Ireland Communication to Committee of Ministers
- The Commission’s October 2015 written submission to the Council of Europe setting out its concern over the execution of the O’Keeffe judgment under Rule 9 is available at: Communication from the Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission in the case of O'Keeffe against Ireland