Citizenship is a matter of “profound significance” says Court
The Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission (‘the Commission’) has described today’s Supreme Court ruling in the case of UM v Minister for Foreign Affairs, which concerned the proper application of the power to revoke refugee status and its interaction with citizenship rights, as “a significant one in respect of citizenship and children’s rights.” The case focused on ‘UM’ who was born in Ireland and asserted Irish citizenship on the basis of his Afghan father’s residency in the country, as a refugee, prior to his birth. His father was granted refugee status in 2006. However the Department of Justice informed the father in August 2013 that the Minister was revoking his refugee status due to fraud. The Commission exercised its amicus curiae (‘friend of the court’) function in this important case and is now studying in detail the two judgments in respect of issues raised relating to the right to citizenship at birth of children born to non-Irish parents. UM, who was born before the revocation of his father’s refugee status, had his Irish passport application refused two years later on the basis that any residence derived from his father’s refugee grant could not be relied on for the purposes of UM’s assertion of citizenship. The Supreme Court heard the case as it raised significant questions of the impact of retrospective application of a decision to revoke refugee status, and the impact of that decision on a child who is a citizen by birth, not having an Irish parent. In the judgments delivered today, the Court set out that “the acquisition or loss of citizenship is a matter of profound significance for the individual concerned. Citizenship is an important aspect of the status of any individual”. The Court accepted the importance of taking account of derivative rights, such as those of children impacted by any decision to revoke refugee status. Significantly, the Court stated that a blanket approach of ‘fraud unravels all”’ could be a dangerous one for a range of reasons, including the impact on derived rights. Sinéad Gibney, Chief Commissioner of the Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission stated:“Today’s Supreme Court ruling is an important one in upholding the rights of the child with respect to citizenship. “We welcome the ruling that the State cannot automatically deprive a child of citizenship at birth because of fraud of another person on whose residence they relied.”ENDS/ For further information, please contact: Sarah Clarkin, IHREC Communications Manager, 01 852 9641 / 087 468 7760 sarah.clarin@ihrec.ie Follow us on twitter @_IHREC