Commission’s Amicus Curiae Legal Submissions Published
The Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission (the ‘Commission’) has appeared before the Supreme Court in exercise of its amicus curiae (‘friend of the court’) function in the case of Middelkamp v. Minister for Justice and Equality. The case focuses on Ms Middelkamp, a Canadian national, who came to the State to be with her husband who was present on foot of a student permission to study dentistry in UCC. Ms. Middelkamp entered the State on a working holiday visa, which entitled her to reside in the State for a maximum of two years without possibility of renewal. Because her permission was due to expire before her husband had completed his dentistry course, Ms Middelkamp applied for permission to remain in the State on a Stamp 4 permission, which would allow her to work. The Minister refused. In written submissions presented to the Supreme Court and published today, the Commission examines the duty on the Minister to consider Ms Middelkamp’s fundamental rights when making a decision under s.4(7) of the Immigration Act 2004. The Commission’s legal submissions discusses first, whether protections under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and secondly the Irish Constitution confer an obligation on the Minister to consider private and family life rights in immigration decision-making. The Commission’s submissions conclude that the Minister is obliged to consider fundamental rights as guaranteed under the Constitution and the European Convention on Human Rights and that the appeal should be dismissed. Sinéad Gibney, Chief Commissioner of the Irish Human Rights and Equality Commission stated:“This case before the Supreme Court raises significant questions on the rights of non-EU nationals temporarily resident in the State and decision-making on immigration permissions.”ENDS/ For further information, please contact: Sarah Clarkin, IHREC Communications Manager, 01 852 9641 / 087 468 7760 sarah.clarkin@ihrec.ie Follow us on twitter @_IHREC